He wants to remove whites from power in the media and give the positions to minorities because there are only so many positions to go around, and whites have too many.
"There's nothing more difficult than this because we have really truly, good, white people in important positions, and the fact of the matter is that there are a limited number of those positions," he said.
"And unless we are conscious of the need to have more people of color, gays, other people in those positions, we will not change the problem. But we're in a position where you have to say who is going to step down so someone else can have power." (1)
So, in other words, whether you deserve the post, whether you are competent or not, he wants to take the position from you if you're white and give it to someone who didn't earn it.
And he threw out the black militant race card: "There are few things, I think, more frightening in the American mind than dark-skinned black men. Here I am." Probably to save the mainstream media the trouble of trotting it out themselves.
I have already covered his gushing admiration of Hugo Chavez. And free speech doesn't mean anything to him.
"At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies," Mr. Lloyd wrote. "The purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance."
Here, again, we have an example of a radical appointed by Obama to make decisions and who is not accountable to the American people.
================
1. Carpenter, Amanda (2009, September 23). "'Diversity czar' takes heat over remarks". The Washington Post.
Retrieved September 23, 2009, from The Washington Post
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment